1.+Research+on+Inquiry+Education

__**The following is some of research that is or has been done in the field of inquiry education:**__

__**We believe in researched based practice in our classrooms and yours!!**__

If you have some literature that you have read that applies to our research or our workshop we would absolutly love to read, please email us a link, pdf, or document to Jdillwsu@hotmail.com or S_tracy@hotmail.com we would really appreciate it!

__**History of Inquiry education**__: (Wolf & Fraser, 2008)(Grandy & Duschl, 2007)(Bybee, 2006) (Barman, 2002)(Martin-Hansen, 2002)(Anderson, 2002)(Colburn, 2000)(Abd-El-Khalick, 2004)(Grandy & Duschl, 2007)(Bybee, 2006) Possibly (Abell, 1999)
 * __Definitions of inquiry currently in use: __**

(Abell, 1999)(Barman, 2002)(Grandy & Duschl, 2007)(Cartier & Stewart, 2000)(Bybee & Van Scotter, 2006) Possibly (Whitin &Whitin, 1997)
 * __Inquiry as a nature of science and relatedness to inquiry education: __**

(Furtak, 2006) (Sandoval, Daniszewski, & Reiser, 1999)(Wolf & Fraser) (Cartier & Stewart, 2000) (Duschl & Gitomer, 1997)(Baumfield, 2006)(Roehrig, 2004)(Colburn, 2000)
 * __Teacher -Student interaction: __**
 * __Teacher interaction during inquiry lessons: __**

(Abell, 1999) (Krajcik, Blumenfeld, Marx, Bass, & Fredricks, 1998)(Rodhrig, 2004)(Wolf & Fraser, 2008) (Bybee & Van Scotter, 2006)(Roehrig, 2004)(Furtak, 2006)(Colburn, 2000)(Sandoval, Daniszewski, & Reiser, 1999)(Barman, 2002)(Martin-Hansen, 2002)(Bybee, 2006)(Catrier & Stewart, 2000) (Anderson, 2002)(Wise & Okey 1983)(Krajcik, Blumenfeld, Marx, Bass, & Fredricks, 1998) (Wolf & Fraser, 2008)(Bybee & Van Scotter, 2006) Need more sources here!!  (Anderson, 2002)(Krajcik, Blumenfeld, Marx, Bass, & Fredricks, 1998) (Abd-El-Khalick, 2004)(Roehrig, 2004)(Wolf & Fraser, 2008)(Bybee & Van Scotter, 2006)(Furtak, 2006) Possibly (Scardamalia & Bereiter, 1992)
 * __Student interaction during inquiry lessons: __**
 * __Levels of inquiry and models of inquiry: __**
 * __Effectiveness of inquiry: __**
 * __Constraints of inquiry: __**

<span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">(Baumfield, 2004)(Sandoval, Daniszewski, & Reiser, 1999)(Anderson, 2002)(Furtak, 2006)
 * __<span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">Suggested future studies in Inquiry education: __**

<span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">David Klahr as sited by Bybee, 2006 Chen & Klahr AAAS: American Association for the Advancement of Science (sited in Cartier & Stewart, 2000) NSES: National Science Education Standards (sited in Bybee & Van Scotter, 2006)
 * __<span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">Other authors to look into : __**

<span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, B., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H. (2004). Inquiry in science education: International perspectives. //Science Education,// 88(3), 397-419. Abell, S. (1999) What’s inquiry? Stories from the field. //Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45//(1), 33-41. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry. //Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13//(1), 1-12. Barman, C.R. (2002). How do you define inquiry? //Science and Children, 40//(2), 8-9 Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. //Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17,// 265-278 Baumfield, V. (2006). Tools for pedagogical inquiry: The impact of teaching thinking skill on teachers. //Oxford Review of Education, 32//(2), 185-196. Bybee, R. W. (2006). How inquiry could contribute to the prepared mind. //The American Biology Teacher, 68//(8), 454-457 Bybee, R.W. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. retrieved from www.BSCS.org on 2/20/09. Bybee, R.W., & Van Scotter, P. (2006). Reinventing the science curriculum: The biological sciences curriculum study proposes a curriculum that puts meaningful learning first. //Educational Leadership,// 64(4), 43-47. Cartier, J. L. & Stewart, J. (2000). Teaching the nature of inquiry: Further developments in a high school genetics curriculum. //Science and Education, 9,// 247-267 Colburn, A. (2000). An inquiry primer. //Science Scope,// 23(6), 42-44. Dushl, R.A. & Gitomer, D.H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. //Educational Assessment, 4//(1), 37-73. Furtak, E.M. (2006). The problem with answers: an exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. //Wiley Interscience,// DOI 10.1002/sce.20130 www.interscience.wiley.com Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., Bass, K. B., & Fredricks, J. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. //The Journal of Learning Sciences, 7//(3,4), 313-350. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining Inquiry. //The Science Teacher, 69//(2), 34-37. Milwood, K. A. & Sandoval, W. A. (2004).[| A comparison of students' beliefs about school] <span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">[|science and professional science] <span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';">. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Assn. San Diego, CA. National Research Council. (2000). //Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning.// Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Roehrig, G.H. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginner secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. //International Journal of Science Education//, //26//(1), 3-24. Sandoval, W.A., Daniszewski, K. Spillane, J.P., Reiser, B.J. (1999). Teachers’ discourse strategies for supporting learning through inquiry. Presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada April 19-23 (download: 2009 Jan 15.) <span style="font-size: 12pt; color: black; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif'; mso-themecolor: text1;">[] <span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; font-family: 'Times New Roman','serif';"> Sandoval, W.A. & Morrison, K. (2003). High school students’ ideas about theories and theory change after a biology inquiry unit. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40//(4), 369-392. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. //Cognition and Instruction, 9//, 177-199. Schwab, J. J. (2000) Enquiry, the science teacher and the educator. //The Science Teacher, 67//(1), 26. Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Bakken, J. P., & Brigham, F. J. (1993). Reading versus doing: The relative effects of textbook-based and inquiry-oriented approaches to science learning in special education classrooms. //The Journal of Special Education, 27//(1), 1-15. Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W.C., & Alport, J.M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on students performance. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20//(5), 387-404. Wise, K.C. & Okey, J.R. (1983). A meta-analysis of the effects of various science teaching strategies on achievement. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20//(5), 419-435. Wolf, S.J., & Fraser, B.J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. //Research Science Education, 38//, 321-341.

Alberts, B. (2000). Foreword: A scientist’s perspective on inquiry. In Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Research Council, National Academy Press. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1994). Benchmarks for Science Literacy. New York: Oxford University Press Anderson, C. (2001). Systemic Reform, Inquiry, and Personal Sense-Making. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching//, //38//, 629-630. Barnum, C. (1997). Students’ views of scientists and science: Results from a national study. //Science and Children//, //35//, 33-38.

Buck, G.A. (1999). Collaboration between science teacher educators and science faculty from Arts & Sciences: A phenomenological study. Presented at the NARST Annual Meeting, Boston. Bybee, R. (2000). Teaching Science as Inquiry. In Minstrell, J. & van Zee, E.H. (Eds.), Inquiring into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C. DeBoer, G. (1991). //A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice//. New York: Teachers College Press.

Dickinson, V.L.; & Flick, L.B. (1998). Beating the system: Course structure and student strategies in a traditional introductory undergraduate physics course for nonmajors. //School Science and Mathematics//, 98(5), 238-246.

Ganguly, I. (1995). Scientific Thinking Is in the Mind’s Eye. ERIC document ED 391504.

Gess-Newsome, J.; Southerland, S.A.; Johnston, A.; Woodbury, S. (in review). Offering a Model of Reform: Tracing the Interaction of Factors that Impact Scientists’ Practice of Reform-based Teaching.

Harding, P.;& Hare, W. (2000). Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Open-Mindedness Rather than Relativism. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching//, 37(3), 225-236.

Harwood, W.S. (in review). Science education reform: Factors affecting collaboration at a research university.

Harwood, W.S.; Reiff, R.; Phillipson, T. (in review). Scientists’ metaphors: Insights into scientific inquiry

Hewson, P.W., Tabachnick, B.R., Zeichner, K.M., & Lemberger, J. (1999). Educating Prospective Teachers of Biology: Findings, Limitations, and Recommendations. Science Education, 83, 373-384.

Keys, C.W. & Bryan, L.A. (2001). Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching//, 38(6), 631-645.

Krajcik, J., Blumenfeld, R., Marx, R., Bass, K., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. //Journal of the Learning Sciences//, 7, 313-350.

Lederman, N. (1998). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. //Electronic Journal of Science Education//, 3(2), December 1998, 1-11.

Magnusson, S.; Hapgood, S.; Palincsar, A.; Ford, D. (2000). Investigating the development of understanding and scientific reasoning via cycles of guided inquiry instruction. In B. Fishman & S.

O’Connor-Divelbiss (Eds.), //Fourth International Conference of the Learning Sciences//, pp. 31-32. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Moore, J.W. (2001). The Essential Profession. Journal of Chemical Education, //78//, 1141.

National Research Council (1996) //National Science Education Standards//. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.

National Research Council (2001) //Educating teachers of science mathematics, and technology: New practices for the new millennium//. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Reiff, R. (in review). If inquiry is so great, why isn’t everyone doing it?

Rutherford, J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. //Journal of Research in Science Teaching//, //2//, 80-84.

Southerland, S.A.; Gess-Newsome, J.; Johnston, A. (in review). Portraying science in the classroom: The manifestation of scientists’ beliefs in classroom practice.

Spence, L.D. (November/December 2001). The Case Against Teaching. //Change//, 11-19.

Stalheim-Smith, A.; & Scharmann, L.C. (1996). General Biology: Creating a positive learning environment for elementary education majors. //Journal of Science Teacher Education//, 7(3), 169-178.

Strauss, A. & Corbin. (1990). //Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques//. Sage Publications.

Tobin, K. (2000). Interpretive Research in Science Education. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.) //Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education//. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Walberg, H.J. (1999). “Chapter Two: Generic Practices” In //Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement.// Second Edition. G. Cawelti, editor. Arlington: Educational Research Service

Welsh, W., Klopfer, L., Aikenhead, G., & Robinson, J. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: Analysis and recommendations. //Science Education//, //65//, 33-50.